Sister Sasagawa also had for some time, a stigmata on her left hand which matched the stigmata which appeared on the statue, at the same time, but on the right hand. Sister Sasagawa and Bishop John Ito both interpreted this to mean that the practice of communion in the hand is not pleasing to God and warned against it.
To corroborate the vital link between Fatima and Akita, former Philippine Ambassador to the Vatican, Howard Dee disclosed in an interview with Inside the Vatican in 1998 that Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger himself said that the message of the third secret of Fatima and the message of Our Lady in Akita are essentially the same in content. However, he said, that he was surprised that the Ratzinger Report did not include this.
Now, it is very plain to see that the reason why the popes decided to keep the Third Secret of Fatima still secret is because it involves the hierarchy of the Catholic Church from the Pope down to the priests. Now, one can recall how John XXIII who had the earnest tendency to open the sealed secret even before Our Lady’s instruction found himself doused with a heavy spirit upon learning its content; disowning it as not of his pontificate and calling the Fatima visionaries as “doomsday prophets”. Now, too, we realize Pope Paul Vi chilling admission that the “smoke of Satan “has entered the Church. These are the Popes who started and closed the Second Vatican Council and they are now canonized saints having been installed in record time because of the relaxed canon in the proclamation of saints. They were even proclaimed much earlier than the Venerable Archbishop Fulton Sheen, in whom the only outstanding “fault” only is his staunch stand against homosexuality. Notice that the cardinals and bishops lobbying against him are part of the gay lobby.
Now also, one can call to mind the 33-day reign of Pope John Paul I propitiously happening just as he had openly decided to investigate Vatican’s financial mess. And now, also, one would remember how Pope John Paul II was hoodwinked into believing that the reform of Roman Ritual for Exorcism was necessary when in fact the newer version is more demon-friendly because the real exorcists in the field were never consulted and the armchair-general cardinals who are modernists watered it down to perhaps, a mere exorcism for ghosts. They even have the statues of St. Michael the Archangel removed from auspicious parts of churches because they actually don’t believe in the existence of the devil or are simply serving him.
Consider too, how Pope Benedict XVI had to resign in the midst of Church scandals which seemed to have overwhelmed his pontificate. And now, we have a pope who really needs our prayers, especially the rosary as eminent in the messages because he couldn’t even properly answer the dubias raised by traditional cardinals and would even resort to synodalities which when analyzed are simply political consensus bodies for the usual modernistic claims of updating the church.
If the strange course of events affecting the papacy mean nothing to you and are simple coincidences or natural courses of history, then please be reminded of the revelations made by Bella Todd before the U.S. Congress before her death, a communist converted by no less than the Ven. Fulton Sheen; and the well-evidenced revelations concerning the St. Gallen Mafia which brought about Pope Francis’ rise to power. Then, too, you would recall how Anibale Cardinal Bugnini, a providentially-exposed Freemason, scuttled the original Vatican Ii schema to institute the so-called Vatican Ii reforms.
But don’t you forget that Vatican II is not the magisterium as somebody said and the Perpetual Sacrifice is indeed perpetual and could not and should not be changed. And remember too, that Vatican II is never dogmatic but is only pastoral in nature. As such, it may not be followed since if it’s a guide found to be untrue to its directions then the real teachings of the church, the true magisterium overrides any of its reform agendum.
Ricardo B. de los Santos
Layman